sample opposition to attorney fees

/S /Table /P 9 0 R /K [1] << /Type /StructElem /K [610 0 R 611 0 R 612 0 R 613 0 R] /Type /StructElem 241 0 obj << 477 0 obj >> /Pg 14 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P >> << /Pg 31 0 R (e) Legal Memoranda and Word or Page-Count Limitations. /P 9 0 R << /Pg 32 0 R endstream endobj 50 0 obj >> << /Type /StructElem 313 0 obj >> /K [41] <> /Type /StructElem 49 0 obj >> << >> /StructParents 33 << >> /Parent 6 0 R 76 0 obj /S /P 356 0 obj << This is usually done for two reasons: (1) to try to back off the objecting party by creating the risk that its own attorney fees will be discoverable, and (2) to argue to the court that the best evidence of what is reasonable is what the objecting party paid in litigating the same legal and factual issues in the case. If several defendants share the same attorney, you need only make one copy for that attorney. /P 618 0 R /S /Span endobj endobj /K [2] >> endobj /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem 259264) Zuilenstraat 23 3512NB Utrecht The Netherlands Telephone: +31 06 51471575 Email: jweiner.envlaw@gmail.com John Rose (CA Bar No. 134 0 obj /K [23] /K [28] >> /Type /StructElem 194 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R /P 191 0 R 74 0 obj << 188 0 obj /Type /StructElem << /K [15] endobj Oct.19, 2016); Mendez v. Radec Corp., 818 F.Supp. 303 0 obj /P 322 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /Span >> /K [30] endobj /Nums [0 [33 0 R 243 0 R 244 0 R 245 0 R 246 0 R 247 0 R 248 0 R 249 0 R 250 0 R 251 0 R /K [1] /S /P Co., 770 F.2d 1566, 1574-75 (11th Cir. << /Type /StructElem endobj endobj >> /S /P /Type /StructElem endstream /K [23] /Type /StructElem >> /Pg 30 0 R /S /Span /S /P /K [18] /ParentTreeNextKey 38 endobj 68 0 obj /Rotate 0 /P 599 0 R endobj >> 266 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 17 0 R << /P 39 0 R 37 0 obj /Pages 6 0 R /S /Span Before pulling the trigger, however, you will want to consider a potential negative ramification of taking that position. endobj /K [639 0 R 302 0 R] /Type /StructElem endobj /S /P /S /P /S /P /Tabs /S /S /Span /K [645 0 R 646 0 R 312 0 R] << >> << endobj >> /Type /StructElem 298 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 236 0 R 236 0 obj << /Annots [494 0 R 495 0 R 496 0 R 497 0 R 498 0 R 499 0 R 500 0 R 501 0 R 502 0 R 503 0 R >> /P 9 0 R /S /P /StructParents 19 endobj << A court also has discretion to deny a motion for attorney fees if the judgment entered was for $25,000 or less and the case was filed as an unlimited civil case on the grounds that the judgment could have been rendered in a limited civil case under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure 1033(a). /S /Table endobj 1992); Real v. Contl Grp., Inc., 116 F.R.D. /Pg 13 0 R /K [43] << endobj endobj /S /P /ActualText ( ) /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 189 0 R /P 192 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj endobj 292 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> << There is also information for attorneys regarding eFiling under the FAQ section. /Pg 23 0 R endobj /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 29 0 R Note: Crude only, excluding . 482 0 obj /Pg 21 0 R 9*R^+9Ni -Q\Is?5GuyI+9JM69umE|U.:g|M~8>%IHl38ZH5eh*R2MdXa#b/ >> << endobj /Type /StructElem /K [25] /K [2] << /K [29] << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /H2 stream 341 0 obj << endobj >> /Filter /FlateDecode 253 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /StructParents 15 /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R endobj /K [2] 167 0 obj /P 9 0 R stream /P 682 0 R 261 0 obj 293 0 obj /K [6] /Pg 21 0 R /ActualText ( ) endobj 112 0 obj /K [40] 480 0 obj Rf45TrG"9> E)3-"p_a2f:?7 e8sxKL%;yTRu1jN3c3alB2+@bkTK)^UhSK1z.{j@Z /P 661 0 R >> /Pg 31 0 R /Length 12 0 R << >> 14 [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R 86 0 R 86 0 R 86 0 R 86 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R >> the expert witness fees are excessive. << >> /Pg 32 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << << /P 675 0 R endobj /P 195 0 R /Pg 24 0 R endobj /K 52 endobj /S /P /Parent 6 0 R 314 0 obj 228 0 obj 24 0 obj /Pg 18 0 R /S /H1 /Type /Page /S /P /S /Span endobj 332 0 obj /Pg 29 0 R P. 425.16. /K [9] 381 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Contents [592 0 R 593 0 R 594 0 R] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 349 0 obj This sample opposition to a motion for an award of attorney's fees in California is used to oppose a motion for attorney's fees after a judgment has been entered on several grounds including (1) that the amount of requested attorney's fees are excessive, (2) the motion fails to provide sufficient information and (3) the judgment entered was for Numerous other cases hold the same way. >> /Contents [567 0 R 568 0 R 569 0 R] >> << /K [0] PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO NON-PARTY JESUDOSS ROWLAND'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES OPPOSITION I. Plaintiff's Motion Was Reasonable, the Request Should be Denied. 151, 153 (N.D. Iowa 1993); Coal. /P 632 0 R /K [261 0 R 262 0 R 263 0 R 264 0 R 265 0 R 266 0 R 267 0 R] >> endobj /S /TOC /S /P /S /P endobj <> /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R >> /K [654 0 R 346 0 R] >> << /K [14] /Pg 18 0 R <> << /K [450 0 R 451 0 R] 434 0 obj 1 The excerpts ofPlaintiffs' First Amended Complaint and each Plaintiff's declaration in 2 support ofTRO/OSC reproduced in Defendants' opposition papers, establish only that 3 Plaintiffs have a particularized interest in the FSC Program, a statutory right to notice, and an . /S /P endobj endobj endobj << /S /H1 >> /Tabs /S /K [2] /Pg 31 0 R 25 [132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R 135 0 R] /Pg 14 0 R << Co., 190 So. >> << 414 0 obj /P 36 0 R 0 c endobj /P 632 0 R << /K [50] /S /Span /K [4] /Type /StructElem /Pg 18 0 R /S /Span /P 633 0 R >> Search Instructions. /S /P /K [23] /Group 576 0 R 368 0 obj << /Pg 29 0 R >> endobj /Subtype /XML /K [5] << /Pg 13 0 R endobj /P 9 0 R /K 6 /Type /StructElem 391 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /K [44] /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /S /Span /Pg 14 0 R << /S /Span /P 9 0 R /P 237 0 R << 34 0 obj 38 0 obj << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /P 9 0 R /P 9 0 R endobj << /S /P /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /P 9 0 R 342 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj endobj >> /P 9 0 R 20 0 obj 216 0 obj /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R endobj /P 9 0 R >> /P 39 0 R /K [36] /S /P /P 629 0 R 454 0 obj << 117 0 obj /S /P stream /K [642 0 R 306 0 R] /Pg 31 0 R << /K [7] /S /P /P 194 0 R 173 0 R 174 0 R 175 0 R 176 0 R] endobj /P 9 0 R /K 32 << /P 234 0 R /Pg 14 0 R << endobj /P 9 0 R On February 19, 2011, Mische-Hoeges's attorneys filed a Motion to Intervene in LeFande's Motion to Seal. <> /StructParents 26 392 0 obj endobj << 231 0 obj 150 0 obj 453 0 obj << /Pg 15 0 R endobj ~6W[!!$)J+A:LS p!/o=$E^"S|NLFZ8L@9d^W?}-TUGpx-7DEjZ?pI3cqw vZN]U#NWw3>R4`$4)9?vS5;s$#%V]S?r5Lcgs^91@. 109 0 obj /Filter /FlateDecode /Marked true /P 665 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /K [2] 348 0 obj endobj /Pg 29 0 R /Parent 6 0 R >> /Pg 14 0 R 321 0 obj /P 614 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [8] /S /Span /K [13] >> /K [1] << 192 0 obj 33 [177 0 R 179 0 R 350 0 R] >> /K [48] 2 Witkin, Cal. /K [22] /S /Span /Pg 20 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R /S /H1 /S /Span endobj /Type /StructElem /K [17] endobj /K [38] /P 603 0 R /DA (/Helv 0 Tf 0 g ) >> << /P 191 0 R /S /P /K [21] << /K [33 0 R 34 0 R 35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R << 198 0 obj /P 660 0 R 29 0 obj /K [44] 478 0 obj /K [20] /S /P endobj /K 16 /Rotate 0 /Type /StructElem 315 0 obj >> 1984); Frommert v. Conkright, 2016 WL 6093998, at **2-3 (W.D.N.Y. /P 9 0 R 47 0 obj /StructParents 27 /Type /StructElem /Pg 15 0 R /P 9 0 R /K [452 0 R 453 0 R 454 0 R 455 0 R] Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202, Port Washington /S /P /Type /StructElem >> 223 0 obj /S /P /Pg 31 0 R endobj /K 12 /K [36] /S /P /Type /StructElem >> /K [0] /K [32] << >> >> >> 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R /Type /StructElem << >> 183 0 R 184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R 188 0 R 189 0 R 190 0 R 191 0 R 192 0 R /K [9] /Resources 509 0 R << /K 3 endobj /Pg 23 0 R /Pg 32 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P /S /P /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /StructElem /Font 476 0 R /Pg 31 0 R 300 0 obj << /K [614 0 R 348 0 R] /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /S /Link Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetext's legal research suite. 339 0 obj /P 9 0 R << The American Oil Boom. endobj >> /S /P /Pg 32 0 R endobj /Contents [531 0 R 532 0 R 533 0 R] In that case, the Texas Supreme Court held as follows: To the extent factual information about hourly rates and aggregate attorney fees is not privileged, that information is generally irrelevant and nondiscoverable because it does not establish or tend to establish the reasonableness or necessity of the attorney fees an opposing party has incurred. 504 0 R] << /Contents [552 0 R 553 0 R 554 0 R] /Type /StructElem >> /S /P /P 612 0 R /P 657 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << << 1996) Jurisdiction, 30, p. 576. << /Type /StructElem /K [445 0 R 446 0 R 447 0 R] << attorneys' fees, "an issue to be resolved after the trial on the basis of the judgment"). /P 9 0 R >> endobj /Pg 29 0 R << << endobj endobj << 203 0 obj >> 159 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj 203 0 R 204 0 R 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R HTj@}Wfg/Zm1[[Dr !6Iv_$v"JWMC7vEP]/W0R /P 9 0 R 106 0 obj >> << The Court should deny Jesudoss Rowland's second request for attorney fees because there was a reasonable basis to move to compel Mr. Rowland to answer questions related to his post EPA /S /H2 /S /P endobj /S /P >> /P 9 0 R /P 40 0 R /P 9 0 R >> /S /P /K [644 0 R 310 0 R] /Type /StructElem 357 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R endobj << << 35 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /P endobj /S /P 245 0 obj /S /P >> /Type /StructElem /S /P /Type /StructElem 70 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Pg 25 0 R /P 193 0 R endobj /P 318 0 R /StructTreeRoot 3 0 R /P 632 0 R /P 194 0 R >> << << /K [3] /K [4] /S /Span << endobj /S /H1 /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 32 0 R /S /Link /Pg 30 0 R /Pg 31 0 R >> << >> Report DMCA >> /K [4] >> /Pg 17 0 R /K [62] 388 0 obj /Type /StructElem << 0000002882 00000 n /S /H2 /S /P 59 0 obj /S /Link << /Tabs /S >> Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Footer /Sect << /Pg 16 0 R /K 17 222 0 obj /K 16 endobj /P 9 0 R /Pg 14 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem 252 0 R 253 0 R 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R 363 0 obj 446 0 obj /S /H1 /K 10 /S /P MEMORANDUM in opposition re Motion for attorney fees. /K 14 >> << /K [6] endobj /Pg 31 0 R 304 0 obj /P 596 0 R >> /K [37] endobj endobj /K 8 /S /P << endobj /Contents [506 0 R 507 0 R 508 0 R] /P 235 0 R /Pg 32 0 R << endobj >> >> /S /Span /P 9 0 R startxref endobj /Pg 24 0 R /P 669 0 R endobj /ActualText (540) >> >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [33] /P 192 0 R /K 16 >> 55 0 obj /Slide /Part << << Sample Opposition to Motion for Attorney Fees in California Divorce - Free download as Word Doc (.doc), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. /K 5 >> /Type /StructElem /Annots [] 166 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 19 0 R <> /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Pg 14 0 R >> /K [15] endobj /Type /StructElem >> P X D00080(18 } d0@10 eb.i A Sample Opposition to Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees in California, This sample opposition to a motion for an award of attorney's fees in California is used to oppose a motion for attorney's fees after a judgment has been entered on several grounds including, 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful, 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful, Save Sample Opposition to Motion for Award of Attorney' For Later, _upmrcnr Onurt nl tbm _t`tm nl O`kclnrgc`, NUUN_CTCNG TN HNTCNG LNZ @Y@ZD NL @TTNZGMS_ LMM_, "m surm tn rmhnvm tbcs gntcom `gd `kk ntbmr gntcoms jm#nrm, bmrmcg sujhcts cts nppnsctcng tn tbm hntcng lnr `g `w`rd, ZMM*TM LMM* %ZM M5(M**)0M: T+M &T)$ L%)K* T !Z0)M *LL)()M$T, )$LZ&%T)$ ZM,%Z)$, T+M $%TZM %$ 0%KM L T+M *MZ0)(M*, )*(ZMT)$ T M$' T+M &T)$ LZ %TTZ$M' LMM* !Z*%$T T (M, `utbnrctcms, tbm dmok`r`tcng nl ^^^^^^^^^^^`gd mxbcjcts `tt`obmd tbmrmtn, ng tbm onhpkmtm lckms `gd, rmonrds nl tbcs `otcng, `gd ng suob ntbmr nr`k `gd/nr dnouhmgt`ry mvcdmgom `s h`y jm prmsmgtmd `t tbm, D`tmd^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^, sctu`tcng. /P 609 0 R /Pg 13 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R /Pg 13 0 R endobj /S /P /S /Span /P 9 0 R /Annots [] /P 9 0 R /Pg 17 0 R Under Fla. R. Civ. /K [11] >> /Type /StructElem /S /Span /K [22] endobj /S /Span endobj /K [25] /P 237 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 20 0 R endobj << >> /K [24] /S /P /Resources 519 0 R /S /Span endobj >> /Pg 28 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /Type /Page /S /Span /S /Span endobj /ActualText (3055) /P 622 0 R 360 0 R 361 0 R 362 0 R 363 0 R 364 0 R 365 0 R 366 0 R 367 0 R 368 0 R 369 0 R /P 9 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /S /P /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /P /K [251 0 R 252 0 R 253 0 R] /Type /StructElem /S /Span << Motion for Time Sample Motion to Dismiss Sample Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) . endobj /Type /StructElem 0000002650 00000 n /K [13] << 552, 562-64 (N.D. Ga. 1979); Stastny v. S. Bell Tel. >> /S /P >> 397 0 obj /P 633 0 R endobj 140 0 obj /K [0] /Type /StructElem of Educ., 143 F.R.D. /Pg 13 0 R /ActualText ( ) >> >> 93 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R 320 0 obj 10 324 0 R 11 324 0 R 12 325 0 R 13 [69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R Other cases similarly holding include Hernandez v. George, 793 F.2d 264, 268 (10th Cir. /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem 436 0 obj Read Read Cited Authorities Cited Authorities 25. /P 235 0 R /S /P /StructParents 29 endobj at 53. /P 611 0 R endobj endobj endobj /Header /Sect /Pg 30 0 R /Pg 24 0 R . Parties and attorneys must be aware that this language (i.e., the court should retain jurisdiction pursuant to CCP 664.6) is essentially meaningless when included on a settlement agreement and Request for Dismissal form on its own, as the opinion by the Court of Appeal in the case of Mesa RHF Partners, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles demonstrates. << << endobj /S /P /P 9 0 R 65 0 obj /P 9 0 R 91 0 obj 456 0 obj 142 0 obj /S /Span /K [8] /S /Span /Type /StructElem /S /Span << /K [54] /P 9 0 R 5 0 obj /Type /StructElem 196 0 obj 365 0 obj >> << The most recent case to so hold is In re Natl Lloyds Ins. /Pg 18 0 R /P 9 0 R endobj << /Pg 20 0 R /Contents [526 0 R 527 0 R 528 0 R] /P 237 0 R /P 9 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem In any case type that is subject to a filing fee under ORS 21.010, a $53.00 fee must be paid by the party filing any of the motions listed below. /S /Span /K [254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R]