To early observers with low-resolution telescopes, M27 and subsequently discovered planetary nebulae somewhat resembled the gas giants, and William Herschel, the discoverer of Uranus, eventually coined the term 'planetary nebula' for them, although, as we now know, they are very different from planets. The large cloud in the center eventually became the sun while the smaller clumps formed the planets, moons, comets and, In inspiring people to have the passion in understanding the universal laws that govern us all, Professor Stephen Hawking reminds us on his speech for his 70th birthday to remember to look up at the stars and not down at your feet (enoch, 2012). The protoplanetary disk is a dense, rotating disk of gas and dust that surrounds a newborn star. To explain that volatile elements like mercury could be retained by the terrestrial planets, he postulated a moderately thick gas and dust halo shielding the planets from the Sun. However, material would be colliding at a high relative velocity in the inter-vortex boundaries and, in these regions, small roller-bearing eddies would coalesce to give annular condensations. The method whereby the disk transforms into distinct planets. Furthermore, for the gas giants, it is predicted that their rotations and moon systems will not be inclined with respect to the ecliptic plane. Terrestrial planets would have no major moons, which does not account for Luna. [31] His book Evolution of the protoplanetary cloud and formation of the Earth and the planets,[32] which was translated to English in 1972, had a long-lasting effect on how scientists thought about the formation of the planets. (3) Besides the sun, there was another star termed as 'intruding star' in . However, it differed significantly from the other major catastrophic hypothesis of the twentieth century, the Chamberlin-Moulton planetesimal hypothesis.. As a result of a detailed mathematical analysis . The first bodies of dust and gas brought together by gravity encounter other, smaller bodies and add them to their mass. The Tom Van Flandern model[19][20][21][22] was first proposed in 1993 in the first edition of his book. The origin of the regular satellites ties directly to planetary formation in that the satellites form in gas and dust disks around the giant planets and may be viewed as mini-solar systems, involving a number of closel According to this hypothesis, planets form from the material that exists in the protoplanetary disk surrounding a newborn star. [8] Today, comets are known to be far too small to have created the Solar System in this way. The Protoplanet / Condensation Hypothesis in Detail 4.6 bya - From Planetesimals to Protoplanets 1) The sun and planets formed from a rotating cloud of interstellar gases and dust called a solar nebula, which consisted of Hydrogen and Helium gas along with microscopic dust grains containing heavier elements produced by earlier stars and supernovas. This planetary formation hypothesis represents an extension of the Whole-Earth Decompression Dynamics (WEDD) model,[25] [45] In 1935, Eddington went further and suggested that other elements might also form within stars. As captured planets would have initially eccentric orbits, Dormand and Woolfson[15][16] proposed the possibility of a collision. By the 16th century, astronomers began to note irregularities in the accepted model of the solar system. Protoplanets theory is the most popular theory that explained how the solar system formed. [1][2] Since the seventeenth century, philosophers and scientists have been forming hypotheses concerning the origins of our Solar System and the Moon and attempting to predict how the Solar System would change in the future. Icarus 153:338347. The IAU narrowed the definition of a planet to three criteria: 12. 4148. Jupiter's Galilean satellites are believed to have formed via co-accretion,[61] while the Solar System's irregular satellites, such as Triton, are all believed to have been captured. In this idea, there were 6 original planets, corresponding to 6 point-masses in the filament, with planets A and B, the two innermost, colliding. Herndon, J. Marvin. (This collapse time is known as the KelvinHelmholtz timescale. Nebular hypothesis is that hypothesis which explains about the whole universe and the solar system had started as a cloud and then compressed under the immense pressure and activity of the gravity. Now, scattered materials are comets, asteroids, and meteoroids. He put forward the notion that planetary orbits are spirals, not circles or ellipses. ENCOUNTER HYPOTHESIS -proposed by Chamberlin and Moulton "The planets formed from debris torn off the Sun by a close encounter with another star." "That our planets, moons, and sun all spun off from a collision between stars." PROTOPLANET HYPOTHESIS -developed by Carl von Weizsacker and Gerard Kuiper "The Solar System begins to form . The matter that was kept within itself began moving in a giant circle and at the center of the spinning cloud a tiny star began to form. 2 0 obj Particles of dust, floating in the disc were attracted to each other by static charges and eventually, gravity. An Introduction to Geology (Johnson, Affolter, Inkenbrandt, and Mosher), { "8.01:_Origin_of_the_Universe" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.02:_Origin_of_the_Solar_SystemThe_Nebular_Hypothesis" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.03:_Hadean_Eon" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.04:_Archean_Eon" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.05:_Proterozoic_Eon" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.06:_Paleozoic" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.07:_Mesozoic" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.08:_Cenozoic" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_Understanding_Science" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_Plate_Tectonics" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_Minerals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_Igneous_Processes_and_Volcanoes" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Weathering_Erosion_and_Sedimentary_Rocks" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_Metamorphic_Rocks" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_Geologic_Time" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Earth_History" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "09:_Crustal_Deformation_and_Earthquakes" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10:_Mass_Wasting" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "11:_Water" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12:__Coastlines" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "13:_Deserts" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "14:_Glaciers" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "15:_Global_Climate_Change" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16:_Energy_and_Mineral_Resources" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, 8.2: Origin of the Solar SystemThe Nebular Hypothesis, [ "article:topic", "showtoc:no", "license:ccbyncsa", "authorname:johnsonaffolterinkenbmosher" ], https://geo.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fgeo.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FGeology%2FBook%253A_An_Introduction_to_Geology_(Johnson_Affolter_Inkenbrandt_and_Mosher)%2F08%253A_Earth_History%2F8.02%253A_Origin_of_the_Solar_SystemThe_Nebular_Hypothesis, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\), Chris Johnson, Matthew D. Affolter, Paul Inkenbrandt, & Cam Mosher, Enough mass to have gravitational forces that force it to be rounded, Large enough to be in a cleared orbit, free of other planetesimals that should have been incorporated at the time the planet formed. Meanwhile, hypotheses explaining the evolution of the Sun originated in the nineteenth century, especially as scientists began to understand how stars in general functioned. He refers to his model as "indivisible" meaning that the fundamental aspects of Earth are connected logically and causally and can be deduced from its early formation as a Jupiter-like giant. Artist's impression of a Mars-sized object crashing into the Earth . However, Pierre-Simon Laplace refuted this idea in 1796, stating that any planets formed in such a way would eventually crash into the Sun. Stage 1 Birth is where gravity contracts the cloud and the temperature rises, becoming a protostar. The Sun, though it contains almost 99.9 percent of the system's mass, contains just 1 percent of its angular momentum,[9] meaning that the Sun should be spinning much more rapidly. Herv Reeves' classification[27] also categorized them as co-genetic with the Sun or not, but also considered their formation from altered or unaltered stellar and interstellar material. [52][53] In 1910, Henry Norris Russell, Edward Charles Pickering, and Williamina Fleming discovered that, despite being a dim star, 40 Eridani B was of spectral type A, or white. His model also used Chandrasekhar's stability equations and obtained density distribution in the gas and dust disk surrounding the primitive Sun. [3], For many years after Apollo, the binary accretion model was settled on as the best hypothesis for explaining the Moon's origins, even though it was known to be flawed. [37][38] There is no consensus on how to explain these so-called hot Jupiters, but one leading idea is that of planetary migration, similar to the process which is thought to have moved Uranus and Neptune to their current, distant orbit. In J. Marvin Herndon's model,[24] The Sun and the planets formed from the contraction of part of a gas/dust cloud under its own gravitational pull and that the small net rotation of the cloud created a disk around the central condensation. 9.8 m/s2 b. Horizontal m There are several different hypotheses that were proposed on how the solar system was created. One problem with the nebular hypothesis is that an unreasonably large amount of gravitational pull would be needed to condense the rings of matter into planets. A comparison of the two figures yields the star's radius. The capture model fails to explain the similarity in these isotopes (if the Moon had originated in another part of the Solar System, those isotopes would have been different), while the co-accretion model cannot adequately explain the loss of water (if the Moon formed similarly to the Earth, the amount of water trapped in its mineral structure would also be roughly similar). The Oort cloud, a zone packed with minuscule and dispersed ice traces, lies beyond that. Centrifugal forces caused some of the matter to fly off of the sun. Many theories have been proposed on how the Solar System existed, but none has been completely successful. Van Flandern, T. 2007. The magnetic field was around 1/100,000 gauss. -9.8 m/s2 Second, the Infrared Astronomical Satellite, launched in 1983, observed that many stars had an excess of infrared radiation that could be explained if they were orbited by discs of cooler material. In 1796, Laplace elaborated by arguing that the nebula collapsed into a star, and, as it did so, the remaining material gradually spun outward into a flat disc, which then formed planets.[8]. The cloud of gas cooled and shrank into a sphere. In a version a year later it was a supernova. planets in our solar system came from. Protoplanets theory is the most popular theory that explained how the solar system formed. Gravity forces solar systems into this cycle. In 1943, Soviet astronomer Otto Schmidt proposed that the Sun, in its present form, passed through a dense interstellar cloud and emerged enveloped in a cloud of dust and gas, from which the planets eventually formed. We also acknowledge previous National Science Foundation support under grant numbers 1246120, 1525057, and 1413739. The theory state that one or more stars are formed as a result of the collapsed giant cloud of molecular dust, which caused a cloud of gas to form around the new stars. He also concluded that if a planet was closer to the sun the great the orbital speed it would have. Corresponding, to this theory, planets what we call know were formed within the disk. In contrast, hypotheses attempting to explain the origin of the Moon have been circulating for centuries, although all of the widely accepted hypotheses were proven false by the Apollo missions in the mid-twentieth century. In the disc, mass accumulated in multiple whirlpools due to friction. In addition, while some volatile compounds such as water are absent from the Moon's crust, many others, such as manganese, are not. Some of the most popular hypotheses include the Nebular hypothesis, the Protoplanet hypothesis, and the, This hypothesis was proposed in the 1900s by astronomer Carl von Weizscker and geologist Gerard Kuiper. It differs from Laplace in that a magnetic torque occurred between the disk and the Sun, which came into effect immediately; otherwise, more and more matter would have been ejected, resulting in a massive planetary system exceeding the size of the existing one and comparable to the Sun. [8] American astronomer Henry Norris Russell also objected to the hypothesis by showing that it ran into problems with angular momentum for the outer planets, with the planets struggling to avoid being reabsorbed by the Sun.[10]. Hypothesis. Protostars are a hypothetical cloud of dust and atoms in space which are believed to develop into a star. McCrea, W. H.; 1978; "The Formation of the Solar System: a Protoplanet Theory" (Chap. Many years later, in the 1900s, the Protoplanet . In the revised version from 1999 and later, the original Solar System had six pairs of twin planets, and each fissioned off from the equatorial bulges of an overspinning Sun, where outward centrifugal forces exceeded the inward gravitational force, at different times, giving them different temperatures, sizes, and compositions, and having condensed thereafter with the nebular disk dissipating after some 100 million years, with six planets exploding. However, it does not explain twinning, the low mass of Mars and Mercury, and the planetoid belts. The smaller part, moving faster relative to the centre of mass, could escape from the solar system, with most of the angular momentum. It incorporates many of . Dermot, ed, pp. When the solar system were first created all that existed were a cold spinning cloud of gas (solar nebula). and exchange of angular momentum between giant planets and the particles in the protoplanetary disc. The impact would have melted Earth's crust, and the other planet's heavy core would have sunk inward and merged with Earth's. The currently accepted theory on the origin of the solar system relies much on information from meteorites. Please do like and share A hypothesis that states about the origin of our solar system, Encounter hypothesis . Thousands of years ago, these things were not widely known. Astrn. The Nebular Hypothesis & Protoplanets The Sun forms from a collapsing cloud of cold interstellar gas and dust. The hypothesis states conservation of angular momentum needed a circulating disk and circulating around paths or orbits which may be treated as disks and sun as its center. The first planetary nebula discovered was the Dumbbell Nebula in the constellation of Vulpecula, observed by Charles Messier in 1764 and listed as M27 in his catalogue of nebulous objects. Also, the Sun, although containing most of the mass in the solar system, has only a small fraction of the angular momentum. Solid planets fissioned off only one moon, and Mercury was a moon of Venus but drifted away as a result of the Sun's gravitational influence. The formation of terrestrial planets, comets, and asteroids involved disintegration, heating, melting, and solidification. T Tauri eruptions of the Sun stripped the gases away from the inner planets. Jupiters massive gravity further shaped the solar system and growth of the inner rocky planets. Another, the fission model, was developed by George Darwin (son of Charles Darwin), who noted that, as the Moon is gradually receding from the Earth at a rate of about 4 cm per year, so at one point in the distant past, it must have been part of the Earth but was flung outward by the momentum of Earth's thenmuch faster rotation. Also, oxygen isotopes in lunar rocks showed a marked similarity to those on Earth, suggesting that they formed at a similar location in the solar nebula. The revised theory, known as the protoplanet hypothesis, was first proposed in 1944 by C. F. von Weizsacker and modified by Gerald P. Kuiper. Academic Press. Similarities of nebular hypothesis and encounter hypothesis? In his view, the Universe was filled with vortices of swirling particles, and both the Sun and planets had condensed from a large vortex that had contracted, which he thought could explain the circular motion of the planets. The protoplanet hypothesis is a scientific theory that explains the early stages of planetary formation in our solar system. Astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus observed that the Planets and stars revolved around the sun not the Earth. [49] There was, however, no known method by which carbon-12 could be produced. While the broad picture of the nebular hypothesis is widely accepted,[34] many of the details are not well understood and continue to be refined. The planets continued to grow over the course of many thousands or millions of years, as material from the protoplanetary disc was added. A Career of Controversy: the Anomaly of T.J.J. North Atlantic. Mercury was incompletely condensed, and a portion of its gases was stripped away and transported to the region between Mars and Jupiter, where it fused with in-falling oxidized condensate from the outer reaches of the Solar System and formed the parent material for ordinary chondrite meteorites, the Main-Belt asteroids, and veneer for the inner planets, especially Mars. In this model, there were 4 phases to the planets: no rotation and keeping the same side to the Sun, very slow, accelerated, and daily rotation. This solved the angular momentum problem by assuming that the Sun's slow rotation was peculiar to it and that the planets did not form at the same time as the Sun. There is therefore no obstacle to placing nuclei closer to each other than electron orbitalsthe regions occupied by electrons bound to an atomwould normally allow. The differences between the inner planets are primarily the consequence of different degrees of protoplanetary compression. This site is using cookies under cookie policy . In: Origin of the Solar System, Robert Jastrow and A. G. W. Cameron, eds., pp. Pluto passed the first two parts of the definition, but not the third. The gravity continued to grow stronger until it collapsed from the force. ADVERTISEMENTS: (2) In the beginning the sun was a big incandescent gaseous mass of matter. If a star is in a binary system, as is the case for Sirius B and 40 Eridani B, it is possible to estimate its mass from observations of the binary orbit. According to this hypothesis, a collision happened and huge amounts of gas from the sun explode out of it but more in the same directions around the sun. Ren Descartes was the first to hypothesize on the beginning of the Solar System; however, more scientists joined the discussion in the eighteenth century, forming the groundwork for later hypotheses on the topic. This hypothesis has some problems, such as failing to explain the fact that the planets all orbit the Sun in the same direction with relatively low eccentricity, which would appear highly unlikely if they were each individually captured.[8]. In 1951, 1962, and 1981, Swiss astronomer Louis Jacot,[18] like Weizscker and Ter Haar, continued the Cartesian idea of vortices but proposed a hierarchy of vortices, or vortices within vortices, i.e. The nebular hypothesis is the possible explanation for how the Sun, the Earth, and the rest of the solar system formed approximately 4.6 billion years ago out of the . Legal. The fate of the protoplanetary disks, for example, is presently impossible to predict. In 1944, German chemist and physicist Arnold Eucken considered the thermodynamics of Earth condensing and raining-out within a giant protoplanet at pressures of 1001000 atm. Some of, Several unresolved problems remain concerning the Orion Nebula. Gravity Instead, the orbits of the classical planets have various small inclinations with respect to the ecliptic. Mon Not R Aston Soc Lett 425:L6L9, 14. Objections of Lyman Spitzer apply to this model also. What is Encounter Hypothesis? The most widely accepted model of planetary formation is known as the nebular hypothesis. Many stars, including the Sun, were formed within this collapsing cloud. According to scientist the Solar System started out as an enormous cloud of gas and dust. The protoplanets might have heated up to such high degrees that the more volatile compounds would have been lost, and the orbital velocity decreased with increasing distance so that the terrestrial planets would have been more affected. 1734, (Principia) Latin: Opera Philosophica et Mineralia (English: Philosophical and Mineralogical Works), (Principia, Volume 1). The challenge of the exploded planet hypothesis. A review of the capture hypothesis of planet formation can be found in.[17]. In the 1950s and early 1960s, discussion of planetary formation at such pressures took place, but Cameron's 1963 low-pressure (c. 410 atm.) Solar Nebular Hypothesis: our solar system formed out of the remains of a nebula that condensed into the sun, planets, and moons of our solar system . [33] In this book, almost all major problems of the planetary formation process were formulated, and some of them were solved. The solar nebula hypothesis predicts that all planets will form exactly in the ecliptic plane. [56] Since hotter bodies radiate more than colder ones, a star's surface brightness can be estimated from its effective surface temperature, and hence from its spectrum. Hoyle, employing the anthropic principle, showed that it must be so, since he himself was made of carbon, and he existed. Moulton and Chamberlin suggested that a star had passed close to the Sun early in its life, causing tidal bulges, and that this, along with the internal process that leads to solar prominences, resulted in the ejection of filaments of matter from both stars. A fraction of the substances in the cloud created a giant plate-like disc around the Sun. This site is using cookies under cookie policy . Whereas, in protoplanet Hypothesis we get to know the present solar system and universe working. In 1955 he proposed a similar system to Laplace, and again proposed the idea with more mathematical detail in 1960. This model was modified[4] in 1948 by Dutch theoretical physicist Dirk Ter Haar, who hypothesized that regular eddies were discarded and replaced by random turbulence, which would lead to a very thick nebula where gravitational instability would not occur. The Nebular Hypothesis is a theory that states that the solar system originated as a primeval nebula. [4] Such a scenario had already been suggested and rejected by Henry Russell in 1935, though it may have been more likely assuming the Sun was born in an open cluster, where stellar collisions are common. Woolfson[28] recognized monistic models, which included Laplace, Descartes, Kant, and Weizscker, and dualistic models, which included Buffon, Chamberlin-Moulton, Jeans, Jeffreys, and Schmidt-Lyttleton. Whereas, in protoplanet Hypothesis we get to know the present solar system and universe working. The outermost part of the solar system is known as the Kuiper belt, which is a scattering of rocky and icy bodies. Stellar evolution stars exist because of gravity. Four of these were helium-dominated, fluid, and unstable. Hoyle concluded that iron must have formed within giant stars. Jacot explained the differences between inner and outer planets and inner and outer moons through vortex behavior. Their luminosity, though, is very low, implying that they must be very small. The Nebular theory states that the solar system was made out of an interstellar cloud of dust and gas. What's the difference and similarity between Nebular, Protoplanet, and Encounter hypothesis? Astronomy is the oldest of the natural sciences, dating back to thousands of years ago. These collisions created the asteroid belt, an unfinished planet, located between Mars and Jupiter. The Nebular Hypothesis. cit.). protoplanet, in astronomical theory, a hypothetical eddy in a whirling cloud of gas or dust that becomes a planet by condensation during formation of a solar system. Tamang sagot sa tanong: Ipakita ang pagkakaiba ng pamayanan at lipunan. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Encounter Hypothesis, Nebular Hypothesis, Protoplanet Hypothesis and more. Exposition-Banner. Density distribution would determine what could form, a planetary system or a stellar companion. Since there is nothing. It is one of the theories that explain how the planets were formed. American chemist Harold Urey, who founded cosmochemistry, put forward a scenario[4] in 1951, 1952, 1956, and 1966 based largely on meteorites. In his treatise Stars and Atoms, Arthur Eddington suggested that pressures and temperatures within stars were great enough for hydrogen nuclei to fuse into helium, a process which could produce the massive amounts of energy required to power the Sun. In 1978, astronomer Andrew J. R. Prentice revived the Laplacian nebular model in his Modern Laplacian Theory by suggesting that the angular momentum problem could be resolved by drag created by dust grains in the original disc, which slowed down rotation in the centre.