The following individuals have been charged with violations of United States law in indictments returned by the Grand Jury. Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas E. Buscemi is prosecuting the case. States filed lawsuits against corporations involved in the opioid crisis. VAT Charges: Card Convenience Fee (incl. The defendant repeatedly abused a 7-year-old girl for whom the defendant was responsible, U.S. Attorney Clint Johnson said. Suite 300 During the 2020 campaign, Biden had laid out a plan to appoint an "opioid crisis accountability coordinator" to support states in their lawsuits against companies accused of sparking the overdose epidemic. The opioid settlements have a built-in protection to address this concern. Updated: Jan 14, 2022 / . "We have an opportunity to see what's the appropriate role of the federal government," LaBelle says. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS All rights reserved. Some people hope the federal government can fill this gap in oversight. 22-CR-374, Jacob William Fairchild. The federal government is not legally obligated to engage in the discussion. Let it be known that the FBI and our law enforcement partners will not tolerate crimes against children, and as evidenced by todays verdict, neither will the community., Nine months later, U.S. District Judge Jack Zouhary sentenced the 32-year-old Perry to life in federal prison. But there is an expectation that the federal government, including the nation's leading agencies on mental health and addiction, should play a role. "If they want, they could try and tie that money to requirements that settlement money be spent on opioids.". He is further charged with coercing and enticing two of the victims to engage in sexual activity. FBI Oklahoma City 2022 Operational Successes 12.06.2022. Some states, like Arkansas and Oregon, have planned for similar possibilities in their public documents about the opioid settlements. The United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Oklahoma announced the federal grand jury sitting in Muskogee completed a four-day session last Friday and returned 90 felony. The agency has tried to recoup costs in at least one case. But it has stopped short of explicitly recommending settlement funds for this purpose. The FBI and Bartlesville Police Department are the investigative agencies. A Tulsa, Oklahoma, man sentenced to life in prison for repeatedly sexually abusing a 7-year-old girl over the course of a year has, since his conviction, decided that he is transgender and refers to himself as she/her. Beating the opioid epidemic by disrupting drug trafficking and expanding access to treatment is one of the four pillars of Biden's "unity agenda.". But interpretations of qualifying expenses vary widely often based on state politics. In Oklahoma, the Department of Human Services, Child Care Services serves as the CCDF Lead Agency and is responsible for conducting eligiblity determinations, issuing payments, monitoring providers, and operating quality improvement activities. In such turf disputes, the lack of federal leadership is acutely felt, say some advocates. In 2019, O'Donnell introduced a bill that removed a prohibition from state law that said spouses of legislators couldn't serve as tag agents. Lock Royce was previously convicted of six felonies, including three crimes of violence. Some people question whether the Biden administration's weighing in would have much impact, given the deep political divisions in some states where local officials are eager to flout federal guidance. Federal Grand Jury A Indictments Announced- June 2022 22-CR-376, Jared Nathan Black. Opioid settlement billions flow to states, as advocates worry about Doty, 30, of Dewey, is charged with engaging in and attempting to engage in sexual acts with a child between 12 and 16 years of age from Nov. 1, 2014, to Aug. 29, 2016. . The Lead Agency works with CCR&Rs to manage consumer education efforts. The return of an indictment is a method of informing a defendant of alleged violations of federal law, which must be proven in a court of law beyond . It is a tribute to some of the people who have died in the country's ongoing opioid epidemic. Alternatively, it could attach conditions to the more than $6 billion in federal grants that goes to states each year to address addiction. Fairchild, 33, of Claremore, is charged with sexually abusing three children between 12 and 16 years of age. In this superseding indictment, Black is also charged with assaulting the victim with a dangerous weapon with the intent to do bodily harm. News FBI - Federal Bureau of Investigation Unlawful Reentry of a Removed Alien. Federal Grand Jury Indictments AnnouncedDecember 2022, Former Chief Financial Officer Faces Charges for Failing to Pay More Than $3.6 Million in Employee Tax Withholdings and for Pocketing $130,000 from His Employers Bank Account, Former Prisoner Transport Officer Pleads Guilty to Sexually Assaulting and Kidnapping Male Detainee, Former Police Officer Admits to Lying to Investigators About Stealing $345 While On-Duty, FBI Oklahoma City 2022 Operational Successes, McCurtain County Resident Pleads Guilty to Child Abuse in Indian Country, Former Oklahoma Supervisory Correctional Officer Sentenced for Promoting White Supremacist Assault on Black Inmates and Ordering Other Abuse, Man Sentenced for Delaware County Murder and Assault, Federal Grand Jury B Indictments Announced-November 2022, Missouri Man Pleads Guilty to Using Violence Against Witnesses with Knowledge of the Disappearance, Murder of a Joplin Woman, Man Convicted for Striking and Killing a Victim with a Water Meter Key, Locust Grove Man Sentenced to 120 Months in Prison After Robbing Woman at Gunpoint in Her Home, Woman Who Drove with Methamphetamine in Her System Sentenced for Taking Another Womans Life in a Collision, Federal Jury Convicts Tulsa Man of Domestic Violence Strangulation, Firearms Charges, Missouri Woman Pleads Guilty to Kidnapping Resulting in Death, Bristow Man Convicted of 2018 Murder in Jenks, Bixby Man Sentenced to Serve Five Years in Federal Prison for Conspiracy to Steal Trade Secrets from Oklahoma City Oil and Gas Company, Former Correctional Officer Pleads Guilty to Accepting Bribes to Smuggle Contraband Into Federal Prison, Federal Grand Jury A Indictments AnnouncedNovember 2022, Former Firefighter Sentenced for Two Bank Robberies, 1 - 20 of 1194 Results hide caption. It is a tribute to some of the people who have died in the country's ongoing opioid epidemic. But today, as billions of dollars actually start to flow and state and local leaders make crucial decisions on how to spend the more than $50 billion windfall to tackle this entrenched public health crisis, the federal government has gone mostly quiet. . Robert Perry II was convicted by a federal jury in 2022 of aggravated sexual abuse of a minor after repeatedly coercing a first-grade girl into submitting to sexual acts in his man cave with offers of candy and other items and the chance to play video games with him. McCurtain County Resident Pleads Guilty to Child Abuse in Indian Country . The defendant preyed on an innocent child solely for his own pleasure, without regard to the grievous and long-lasting harm his depraved conduct would cause, the special agent in charge of the FBIs Oklahoma City Field Office, Edward Gray, said. Official websites use .gov For example, in New York, Democratic Gov. Medicaid, a public insurance program for people with low incomes or disabilities, was a leading payer. Below are all criminal cases in Western District of Oklahoma, for 2022, with case numbers 2022-cr-00000 through 2022-cr-00499. May 02, 2023. . 2023 The New York Sun Company, LLC. Criminal Cases in Western District of Oklahoma, 2022, case numbers 2022-cr-00000 through 2022-cr-00499. No Thanks Alex Wong/Getty Images In 2019, CMS sent a letter to Oklahoma asking for part of the state's $270 million settlement with Purdue Pharma, maker of OxyContin. An official website of the United States government. Robert Perrys crimes are despicable. Drug Conspiracy; Manufacture of Methamphetamine; Possession of Methamphetamine with Intent to Distribute; Possession of Fentanyl with Intent to Distribute; Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Distribute; Maintaining a Drug-Involved Premises; Possession of Firearms in Furtherance of a Drug Trafficking Crime; Felon in Possession of Firearms and Ammunition. Bruce Alexander, spokesperson for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, declined to answer specific questions and simply wrote, "CMS is currently reviewing the issue.". A lock ( Federal grand jury hands down record number of indictments as a result ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. Baltimore Eight Tray Gangster Crips Member Sentenced to Almost 20 Years in Federal Prison for Racketeering and Drug Conspiracy Charges April 5, 2023 Read More Press Release West Hartford Man. The policy was a reversal of Trump-era rules that required inmates to be housed in units based solely on their biological sex. The following year, the White House convened a meeting about the soon-to-be finalized settlements, noted that the money could support drug policy priorities, and helped create a model law that states could adopt in anticipation of receiving funds. Early in President Joe Biden's tenure, his administration promised to play a key role in ensuring opioid settlement funds went toward tackling the nation's addiction crisis. Earlier this year, Republican leaders in Tennessee rejected millions of dollars in federal funding for HIV prevention to push back on federal support for transgender and abortion rights. Subscribe The Faces of Fentanyl Memorial at the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. PDF Federal Supports for Afterschool and Summer Child Care Oklahoma A lock () or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. An activist group that seeks to prevent the housing of men who identify as women in female-only prisons, Keep Prisons Single Sex USA, says there are more than 1,500 federal inmates who identify as transgender in the United States, nearly half of whom are in prison for sex-related crimes. She cited "various state and federal laws" that make such sites illegal. Former Oklahoma undersheriff indicted in federal court for allegedly And the settlement funds are mentioned just twice in a 150-page national strategy to reduce drug trafficking and overdose deaths. As such, under the Bureau of Prisons guidelines, the convict is eligible to serve out his sentence in a federal prison for women. Press Releases FBI - Federal Bureau of Investigation But Regina LaBelle, who was acting director of national drug control policy during Biden's early years and now works for Georgetown University's O'Neill Institute, says the federal government has managed to guide state policy on controversial topics before. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcements Homeland Security Investigations, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and Broken Arrow Police Department are the investigative agencies. School-Age Children He is further alleged to have possessed a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. Or it could go to groups that provide sterile syringes and other supplies to people using drugs, which can't be purchased with taxpayer dollars. Federal Criminal Cases, Western District of Oklahoma, 2022, 2022-cr They are further charged with aiding and abetting each other to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine and to possess with intent to distribute 40 grams or more of fentanyl. A Tulsa, Oklahoma, man sentenced to life in prison for repeatedly sexually abusing a 7-year-old girl over the course of a year has, since his conviction, decided that he is transgender and refers to himself as she/her. Kathy Hochul rejected a recommendation to use opioid settlement funds to support two overdose prevention centers places where people can use illicit drugs under supervision. Federal Grand Jury A Indictments Announced-November 2022 Such initiatives are designed to minimize the risks of using drugs but are politically fraught, with critics saying they encourage illegal activity and supporters saying they save lives. In the end, all states complied. He is further charged aiding and abetting another individual with using and maintaining a place in Broken Arrow for the purpose of distributing an illicit drug. TULSA, Okla. A Claremore man found with more than 500 images of child sexual abuse material on his electronic devices pleaded guilty Tuesday in federal court, announced U.S. Attorney TULSA, Okla. A Depew man who used Snapchat to coerce and entice a minor to commit sexual acts was convicted Thursday in federal court, announced U.S. Attorney Clint Johnson. An official website of the United States government. hide caption. They are also charged with aiding and abetting each other to manufacture and possess with intent to distribute cocaine. The federal government can emphasize the more flexible options for spending the settlement money compared with federal funds, Gilbert said. "There are opportunities to incentivize" and support state and local governments "in the right direction," says Michele Gilbert, a senior policy analyst with the think tank Bipartisan Policy Center. O'Donnell, a Catoosa Republican, was indicted in December 2021 on five felony counts and three misdemeanors while his wife, Teresa O'Donnell, was charged with three felonies and one misdemeanor. Show 20 More Items, emailStay Connected Today, less than 3% of the annual payouts support anti-smoking programs. Given the energy crisis at the time, the administration wanted states to reduce oil consumption by imposing a maximum speed limit of 55 mph. The Biden administration can issue official guidance, promote the findings of national research, or leverage the power of its purse strings. He is also charged with sexually abusing one of the victims who was incapable of providing consent at the time and with sexually abusing the same victim using force. Assistant U.S. Attorney Gina S. Gilmore is prosecuting the case. Tulsa, OK 74119, Phone:(918) 382-2700 Today, the Biden administration could provide data to similarly inform local decisions, LaBelle says. United States Attorney Clint Johnson today announced the results of the November 2022 Federal Grand Jury A. Advocates want to make sure it is used to treat addiction. That's why the administration helped create a model law, as "a blueprint for states and communities on evidence-based ways to use opioid settlement funds," he said. The two are charged with aiding and abetting each other to knowingly use and maintain a residence for the purpose of storing, manufacturing, and distributing the drugs. The judge recommended that Perry be remanded to a medium security prison or a facility that will allow him the opportunity in the most comprehensive mental health and gender-care treatment programs.. TULSA, Okla. United States Attorney Clint Johnson today announced the results of the November 2022 Federal Grand Jury A. The FBI and Jenks Police Department are the investigative agencies. As states start to get opioid settlement cash, few are sharing how they spend it, 2022 was a deadly (but hopeful) year in America's opioid crisis. They are charged with possessing firearms in furtherance of their drug trafficking crimes, and finally, Daniel Burns is charged with being a felon in possession of a Glock .45 caliber lever-action rifle; an FN 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; a Smith & Wesson .45 caliber semiautomatic pistol; a Sig Sauer 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; a PWS .223 caliber rifle; a CZ 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; a Radikal, 12 gauge semiautomatic shotgun; an Anderson Manufacturing multi-caliber rifle; a DPMS .223/5.56 caliber rifle; a Glock 9X19 semiautomatic pistol; a Marlin, .270 Win rifle; a Canick 9X19 mm semiautomatic pistol; a Taurus 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; and a Sig Sauer 9 mm semiautomatic pistol. Black, 46, of Jenks, is charged with pointing a firearm at the victims head and pulling the trigger with intent to commit murder after the victim intervened in a domestic assault on Dec. 26, 2020. No federal employee holds the title of opioid crisis accountability coordinator. KFF Health News, formerly known as Kaiser Health News (KHN), is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism. Sexual Abuse of a Minor in Indian Country; Abusive Sexual Contact with a Minor in Indian Country; Incest in Indian Country. The FBI, Rogers County Sheriffs Office and Mayes County Sheriffs Office are the investigative agencies. "States get wide eyes when they get these huge pots of money," says Bill Pierce, who served as spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services in the early 2000s. Black is further charged with discharging the firearm during a crime of violence. "We know that expanding access to treatment for substance use disorder, lifesaving interventions like naloxone, and recovery support services will reduce the harms of addiction and the overdose epidemic," said Rahul Gupta, director of national drug control policy. Mr. Norvell is Washington Editor of The New York Sun. Nathaniel Burns, 36, and Ashley Burns, 28, both of Tulsa, are charged with conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, 40 grams or more of fentanyl, and cocaine. According to Phil Bacharach, spokesperson for the Oklahoma attorney general's office, the state eventually reached an agreement to keep all its Purdue settlement but later pay $390,000 to the . 2022 CHEVROLET SILVERADO K2500 CUSTOM for Sale | OK - OKLAHOMA CITY "It's not too late.". He was there when states began receiving cash from the tobacco settlement. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used. Federal Grand Jury A Indictments Announced- August 2022 Friday, August 5, 2022 For Immediate Release U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Oklahoma United States Attorney Clint Johnson today announced the results of the August 2022 Federal Grand Jury A. Oklahoma AG to drop charges against GOP Rep. and his wife A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. Under guidelines published by the Bureau of Prisons in January 2022, prison managers are instructed to consider inmates gender identity when deciding where to house those inmates. VAT if applicable) ", The Office of National Drug Control Policy told KFF Health News it regularly discusses the use of settlement dollars with governors, mayors, and other elected officials to ensure the money bolsters federal efforts already underway. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. And oversight so far has been weak. Cases, Dockets and Filings in Oklahoma 22-CR-192, Christopher Scott Royce. Only the federal government or tribes have jurisdiction to prosecute cases that occur in Indian Country that involve Native American defendants. But so far, "there hasn't been a lot of federal government action on the settlement. For instance, the money could support grassroots organizations that don't have the time or ability to apply for federal grants, she said. Finally, he is charged with possessing child sexual abuse material. Assault with Intent to Commit Murder in Indian Country; Carrying, Using, and Brandishing a Firearm During and in Relation to a Crime of Violence; Assault with a Dangerous Weapon with Intent to do Bodily Harm in Indian Country. Myers, of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, put it this way: "States will only listen to the federal government if there's a financial reason to do so.". A national dashboard launched late last year to show nonfatal overdoses is a start. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Advocates want to make sure it is used to treat addiction. Now, about $50 billion in settlement funds have begun to flow to state governments. The companies paying out the money are responsible for holding states to that threshold, but they're unlikely to monitor closely, legal experts say. Assistant U.S. Attorney Justin G. Bish is prosecuting the case. Northern District of Oklahoma Jan 14, 2022 / 04:41 PM CST. U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Oklahoma, Federal Grand Jury A Indictments Announced-November 2022, Claremore Man Pleads Guilty After Being Found with 500+ Images of Child Pornography, Eucha Man Sentenced for Strangling an Intimate Partner. "The federal government is spending a lot of money on opioids," says Pierce, the former HHS spokesperson. As such, under the Bureau of Prisons guidelines, the convict is eligible to serve out his sentence in a federal prison for women. A similar conversation is taking place in San Francisco, with the mayor citing a lack of federal legal clarity on the issue. Health policy experts suggest the Biden administration could use the possibility of claiming those funds as leverage: In return for allowing states to keep the cash, it could require all of it be spent on addressing the opioid crisis or be used only for treatments backed by research. Assistant U.S. Attorney Ben Tonkin is prosecuting the case. Federal Grand Jury A Indictments Announced- June 2022 Press Release Federal Grand Jury A Indictments Announced- June 2022 Thursday, June 9, 2022 For Immediate Release U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Oklahoma United States Attorney Clint Johnson today announced the results of the June 2022 Federal Grand Jury A. Fax: (918) 560-7938. ", When it comes to the opioid settlements, it's not clear if the federal government will try to claim repayment for Medicaid expenses linked to opioid addiction, which was estimated at $23 billion in 2019. But as of mid-March, neither state had received federal requests for their share. Oklahoma Pedophile Changes Pronouns to 'She/Her' After Receiving Life According to Phil Bacharach, spokesperson for the Oklahoma attorney general's office, the state eventually reached an agreement to keep all its Purdue settlement but later pay $390,000 to the federal agency from a separate settlement with opioid manufacturer Endo. But there were no restrictions on the money's use and much of it went to plugging state budget gaps, filling potholes, and even subsidizing tobacco farmers. Public vigilance could help, but most states have promised little to no public reporting, making it difficult to track their use of funds. KFF Health News is following how state and local governments use or misuse the cash through this year. 22-CR-378, Brian Keith Doty. After all, states filed the lawsuits against companies that made, sold, or distributed opioid painkillers, including Johnson & Johnson, McKesson, and Walmart. At least 85% of the money states receive must be spent on opioid-related expenses. 21-CR-9, Nathaniel Dale Burns; Ashley Elizabeth Burns. Used & Repairable Salvage 2022 CHEVROLET SILVERADO K2500 CUSTOM for sale in OK - OKLAHOMA CITY on Tue. Finally, he is charged with incest. Those lawsuits aimed, in part, to recover health care costs for smoking-related illnesses. Kentucky, identified as a hot spot, went on to implement policies that dramatically increased the number of syringe service programs, which are known to reduce HIV transmission. The return of an indictment is a method of informing a defendant of alleged violations of federal law, which must be proven in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt to overcome a defendants presumption of innocence. 22-CR-163. In 2015, shortly after intravenous drug use sparked a major HIV outbreak in Scott County, Indiana, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a study showing other counties were similarly vulnerable. Public policy and health experts say a vacuum of federal leadership could lead to serious wasted opportunities and missteps in the use of the billions that will be paid out over nearly two decades in what could be an unfortunate reprise of the multibillion-dollar 1998 settlement with tobacco companies. On or about January 11, 2022, Jimenez-Lobaina, 29, of Tulsa, intentionally possessed with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. (okwd-5:2022-cr-00058-116810), USA v. Duncan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00330-118988), USA v. Duncan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00330-118989), USA v. Dyer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00209-117963), USA v. Dyer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00209-117964), USA v. Evans (okwd-5:2022-cr-00219-118189), USA v. Fields (okwd-5:2022-cr-00442-119779), USA v. Figueroa-Cifuentes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00401-119493), USA v. Franklin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00375-119344), USA v. Franklin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00375-119343), USA v. Franklin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00375-119345), USA v. Fransen et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00232-118175), USA v. Garcia (okwd-5:2022-cr-00093-117121), USA v. Garcia (okwd-5:2022-cr-00093-117122), USA v. Garcia-Quevedo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00125-117399), USA v. Griffitts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00250-118372), USA v. Hall (okwd-5:2022-cr-00444-119786), USA v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00317-118826), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00230-118192), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00114-117404), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00230-118191), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00328-118991), USA v. Hawkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00347-119024), USA v. Henderson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00078-116963), USA v. Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00251-118353), USA v. Hill (okwd-5:2022-cr-00077-116964), USA v. Hinojosa Velasquez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00486-120093), USA v. Hinojosa Velasquez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00486-120092), USA v. Hinton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00326-118972), USA v. Hocker (okwd-5:2022-cr-00424-119660), USA v. Hopkins et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00203-117925), USA v. Hopkins et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00203-117926), USA v. Hopkins et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00203-117924), USA v. House (okwd-5:2022-cr-00174-117723), USA v. Hugar (okwd-5:2022-cr-00092-117131), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00059-116807), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00378-119307), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00429-119680), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00059-116806), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00429-119681), USA v. Jacobs (okwd-5:2022-cr-00210-117967), USA v. James (okwd-5:2022-cr-00154-117586), USA v. James (okwd-5:2022-cr-00154-117587), USA v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00369-119318), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00345-119018), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00376-119305), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00039-116619), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00193-117929), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00178-117720), USA v. Jordan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00339-119006), USA v. Jordan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00339-119007), USA v. Kays (okwd-5:2022-cr-00040-116627), USA v. Kelley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00159-117574), USA v. Kelley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00395-119451), USA v. Killian et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00025-116486), USA v. King (okwd-5:2022-cr-00488-120116), USA v. Lack (okwd-5:2022-cr-00336-118997), USA v. Lacy (okwd-5:2022-cr-00277-118521), USA v. Lalehparvaran (okwd-5:2022-cr-00319-118800), USA v. Landers (okwd-5:2022-cr-00434-119684), USA v. Lara (okwd-5:2022-cr-00464-119934), USA v. Liles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00216-118212), USA v. Long (okwd-5:2022-cr-00256-118356), USA v. Long (okwd-5:2022-cr-00024-116483), USA v. Luo et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00449-119825), USA v. Lynch (okwd-5:2022-cr-00298-118668), USA v. Madala (okwd-5:2022-cr-00150-117583), USA v. Madison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00432-119676), USA v. Mahan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00191-117934), USA v. Manzano (okwd-5:2022-cr-00176-117714), USA v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00495-120106), USA v. Martin, et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00094-117125), USA v. Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00300-118672), USA v. Martinez-Gallardo et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00462-119946), USA v. Mazariegos-Mencia (okwd-5:2022-cr-00303-118803), USA v. McCane (okwd-5:2022-cr-00213-117923), USA v. McCollum (okwd-5:2022-cr-00211-117918), USA v. McGee (okwd-5:2022-cr-00023-116480), USA v. McGinley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00122-117395), USA v. McKane (okwd-5:2022-cr-00213-117922), USA v. McKenzie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00454-119792), USA v. Medina-Gil (okwd-5:2022-cr-00487-120102), USA v. Mendez-Vasquez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00181-117736), USA v. Montijo-Varela et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00465-119952), USA v. Monts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00329-118980), USA v. Moreno (okwd-5:2022-cr-00306-118805), USA v. Moreno et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00404-119470), USA v. Moseley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00241-118341), USA v. Muhammad (okwd-5:2022-cr-00430-119665), USA v. Muhammad (okwd-5:2022-cr-00430-119666), USA v. Najera-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00195-117945), USA v. Nava et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00221-118214), USA v. Nguyen et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00380-119296), USA v. Nguyen et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00380-119294), USA v. Nicholas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00079-116984), USA v. Nicholas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00079-116982), USA v. Nicholas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00079-116983), USA v. Ochoa-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00472-119928), USA v. Olguin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00294-118691), USA v. Outland (okwd-5:2022-cr-00385-119324), USA v. Padilla-Chairez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00289-118685), USA v. Parks (okwd-5:2022-cr-00297-118682), USA v. Parrish (okwd-5:2022-cr-00318-118828), USA v. Peevy (okwd-5:2022-cr-00493-120111), USA v. Plummer et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00348), USA v. Poafpybitty (okwd-5:2022-cr-00222-118187), USA v. Pohawpatchoko (okwd-5:2022-cr-00206-117920), USA v. Porter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00164-117619), USA v. Porter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00155-117547), USA v. Prado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00299-118678), USA v. Prince (okwd-5:2022-cr-00157-117595), USA v. Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00161-117560), USA v. Ramos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00180-117716), USA v. Ramos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00180-117717), USA v. Ricketts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00168-117733), USA v. Ricketts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00168-117732), USA v. Rivera et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00152-117556), USA v. Rodriguez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00422-119662), USA v. Rodriguez-Cordova (okwd-5:2022-cr-00471-119926), USA v. Rodriguez-Cordova (okwd-5:2022-cr-00471-119925), USA v. Rodriguez-Garcia et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00455-119814), USA v. Rodriguez-Morales (okwd-5:2022-cr-00313-118798), USA v. Romero et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00490-120078), USA v. Romero et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00490-120079), USA v. Romero et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00490-120081), USA v. Romero-Arredondo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00362-119282), USA v. Royal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00060-116813), USA v. Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00433-119671), USA v. Salaices (okwd-5:2022-cr-00461-119958), USA v. Saldivar (okwd-5:2022-cr-00451-119775), USA v. Sandoval (okwd-5:2022-cr-00235-118207), USA v. Santiago (okwd-5:2022-cr-00253-118388), USA v. Santizo-Roblero (okwd-5:2022-cr-00148-117576), USA v. Schenck (okwd-5:2022-cr-00373-119288), USA v. Schenck (okwd-5:2022-cr-00373-119289), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00095-117128), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00351-119026), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00205-117927), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00477-119949), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00275-118503), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00340-119008), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00212-117914), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00074-116952), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00427-119673), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00207-117959), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00208-117946), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00076-116946), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00156-117549), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00258-118392), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00453-119823), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00296-118666), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00374-119330), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00476-119937), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00311-118817), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00024-116482), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00406-119456), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00057-116804), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00295-118680), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00078-116962), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00209-117962), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00152-117554), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00326-118971), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00318-118827), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00319-118799), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00371-119271), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00408-119494), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00231-118161), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00316-118819), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00344-119022), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00379-119290), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00126-117353), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00341-119004), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00407-119460), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00495-120105), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00277-118520), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00317-118825), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00257-118377), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00350-119020), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00119-117382), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00455-119804), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00346-119012), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00084-117055), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00274-118516), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00233-118195), USA v. Simental (okwd-5:2022-cr-00177-117727), USA v. Simental (okwd-5:2022-cr-00177-117726), USA v. Simmons (okwd-5:2022-cr-00255-118345), USA v. Simms (okwd-5:2022-cr-00153-117571), USA v. Simms (okwd-5:2022-cr-00153-117570), USA v. Singer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00309-118809), USA v. Singer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00309-118810), USA v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00272-118506), USA v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00038-116625), USA v. Solis-Mancilla (okwd-5:2022-cr-00280-118527), USA v. Soutter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00390-119327), USA v. Stanley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00075-116951), USA v. Stanley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00075-116950), USA v. Taber (okwd-5:2022-cr-00252-118362), USA v. Tahmasebi (okwd-5:2022-cr-00037-116639), USA v. Tevalan-Ajanel (okwd-5:2022-cr-00172-117741), USA v. Thomas Jr (okwd-5:2022-cr-00410-119477), USA v. Thompson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00120-117415), USA v. To et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00450-119789), USA v. Torralba (okwd-5:2022-cr-00278-118519), USA v. Torralba (okwd-5:2022-cr-00278-118518), USA v. Urias et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00190-117939), USA v. Wang (okwd-5:2022-cr-00240-118369), USA v. Wang (okwd-5:2022-cr-00240-118370), USA v. Warren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00475-119940), USA v. Warren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00475-119939), USA v. Warren et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00123-117407), USA v. Warren et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00123-117411), USA v. Washington (okwd-5:2022-cr-00446-119788), USA v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00325-118982), USA v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00428-119670), USA v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00466-119961), USA v. Welge (okwd-5:2022-cr-00365-119286), USA v. White (okwd-5:2022-cr-00121-117389), USA v. White (okwd-5:2022-cr-00179-117728), USA v. White (okwd-5:2022-cr-00179-117729), USA v. Wilkinson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00200-117952), USA v. Wood (okwd-5:2022-cr-00463-119945), USA v. Woodfork (okwd-5:2022-cr-00467-119962), USA v. Worden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00341-119005), USA v. Yates (okwd-5:2022-cr-00377-119314), USA v. Yates (okwd-5:2022-cr-00377-119313), USA v.Woodley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00348-119016), USA v.Woodley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00348-119017), United States of America v. Aguilar-Morales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00263), United States of America v. Aguilar-Torres (okwd-5:2022-mj-00031), United States of America v. Aguilar-Torres (okwd-5:2022-cr-00334-118994), United States of America v. Aguilera-Nunez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00398-119458), United States of America v. Aldama-Martinez et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00211), United States of America v. Alston (okwd-5:2022-mj-00036), United States of America v. Alvarado-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00034-116624), United States of America v. Alvarado-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00034-116623), United States of America v. Alvarez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00292-118686), United States of America v. Alvarez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00482), United States of America v. Anderson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00142-117578), United States of America v. Anglin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00393-119466), United States of America v. Anguiano-Moncivais (okwd-5:2022-cr-00333-118998), United States of America v. Antoine (okwd-5:2022-mj-00236), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119817), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119820), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119819), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119818), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119816), United States of America v. Arnett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00491-120113), United States of America v. Arrellano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00087-117116), United States of America v. Arrellano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00087-117117), United States of America v. Arroyo et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00239-118347), United States of America v. Arroyo et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00400), United States of America v. Austin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00096), United States of America v. Avilla-Arrellano et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00110), United States of America v. Bacca (okwd-5:2022-mj-00123), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116348), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116359), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116362), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116355), United States of America v. Bailey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00420), United States of America v. Barcenas-Velasquez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00030), United States of America v. Barcenas-Velasquez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00061-116746), United States of America v. Barkus (okwd-5:2022-mj-00396), United States of America v. Barrios (okwd-5:2022-cr-00312-118821), United States of America v. Barron-Orquiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00364-119275), United States of America v. Battiest (okwd-5:2022-cr-00261-118409), United States of America v. Bedwell (okwd-5:2022-mj-00353), United States of America v. Been (okwd-5:2022-cr-00268-118499), United States of America v. Bell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00266-118497), United States of America v. Benavidez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00478), United States of America v. Benfall (okwd-5:2022-cr-00417-119682), United States of America v. Bennett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00263-118475), United States of America v. Benson et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00252), United States of America v. Bernabe-Chagollan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00259-118331), United States of America v. Bernabe-Chagollan (okwd-5:2022-mj-00135), United States of America v. Berry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00248-118364), United States of America v. Biggs (okwd-5:2022-cr-00030-116614), United States of America v. Biggs (okwd-5:2022-mj-00052), United States of America v. Bishop (okwd-5:2022-cr-00416-119635), United States of America v. Black (okwd-5:2022-mj-00484), United States of America v. Bliffin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00024), United States of America v. Blitch (okwd-5:2022-cr-00414-119592), United States of America v. Blodgett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00063-116931), United States of America v. Blodgett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00062-116929), United States of America v. Bomgren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00194-117916), United States of America v. Bomgren (okwd-5:2022-mj-00275), United States of America v. Bond (okwd-5:2022-cr-00264-118509), United States of America v. Bourdeau (okwd-5:2022-mj-00235), United States of America v. Bralley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00355-119033), United States of America v. Brand (okwd-5:2022-cr-00002-116330), United States of America v. Brand (okwd-5:2022-cr-00002-116331), United States of America v. Breese et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00068-116959), United States of America v. Breese et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00086), United States of America v. Brown (okwd-5:2022-mj-00051), United States of America v. Brown (okwd-5:2022-cr-00496-120171), United States of America v. Brown (okwd-5:2022-cr-00097-117186), United States of America v. Buckaloo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00011-116510), United States of America v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00265-118495), United States of America v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00473-119942), United States of America v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00446), United States of America v. Bulock (okwd-5:2022-cr-00426-119663), United States of America v. Butler (okwd-5:2022-mj-00301), United States of America v. Campbell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00138-117601), United States of America v. Cantu (okwd-5:2022-cr-00117-117363), United States of America v. Cantwell (okwd-5:2022-mj-00035), United States of America v. Carbajal-Badillo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00445-119794), United States of America v. Cardenas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00391-119268), United States of America v. Casasnovas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00198-117948), United States of America v. Casasnovas et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00233), United States of America v. Castro (okwd-5:2022-mj-00064), United States of America v. Chavez-Gomez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00082-117064), United States of America v. Chen (okwd-5:2022-cr-00305-118801), United States of America v. Church (okwd-5:2022-mj-00164), United States of America v. Clague (okwd-5:2022-mj-00087), United States of America v. Clayton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00047-116862), United States of America v. Clemente-Mendez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00146-117580), United States of America v. Clemente-Mendez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00256), United States of America v. Coleman et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00035-116629), United States of America v. Cook (okwd-5:2022-cr-00361-119252), United States of America v. Cooke (okwd-5:2022-cr-00457-119921), United States of America v. Cooper (okwd-5:2022-cr-00301-118712), United States of America v. Cox (okwd-5:2022-cr-00284-118664), United States of America v. Cox (okwd-5:2022-mj-00474), United States of America v. Crawford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00303), United States of America v. Cruz-Torres (okwd-5:2022-cr-00225-118159), United States of America v. Dalton et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00001-116334), United States of America v. Davis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00025), United States of America v. Davis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00478-119965), United States of America v. Davis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00358-119141), United States of America v. Dawson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00465), United States of America v. Day (okwd-5:2022-cr-00412-119542), United States of America v. De La Cruz Florentino et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00086-117113), United States of America v. De La Cruz Florentino et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00086-117114), United States of America v. De La Cruz Florentino et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00086-117115), United States of America v. De Lara-Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00383), United States of America v. De Lara-Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00386), United States of America v. De Lara-Rojas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00260-118333), United States of America v. Deyo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00413-119583), United States of America v. Diaz-Bustamante (okwd-5:2022-cr-00485-120097), United States of America v. Donaldson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00059), United States of America v. Dooley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00360-119209), United States of America v. Downes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00187-117796), United States of America v. Downes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00188-117798), United States of America v. Dyson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00227), United States of America v. Dyson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00112-117427), United States of America v. Earnest (okwd-5:2022-mj-00165), United States of America v. Easton (okwd-5:2022-mj-00395), United States of America v. Edmond (okwd-5:2022-mj-00186), United States of America v. Espinoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00167-117744), United States of America v. Estrada-Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00227-118167), United States of America v. Evans (okwd-5:2022-mj-00341), United States of America v. Falany (okwd-5:2022-mj-00038), United States of America v. Felty (okwd-5:2022-mj-00166), United States of America v. Fenstermacher (okwd-5:2022-mj-00167), United States of America v. Ferreris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00459-119771), United States of America v. Ferreris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00459-119770), United States of America v. Fierro-Zaragoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00017-116516), United States of America v. Figueroa (okwd-5:2022-cr-00140-117599), United States of America v. Figueroa (okwd-5:2022-mj-00242), United States of America v. Figueroa-Cifuentes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00401-119492), United States of America v. Finto (okwd-5:2022-mj-00094), United States of America v. Finto (okwd-5:2022-cr-00071-116970), United States of America v. Flores (okwd-5:2022-mj-00056), United States of America v. Flores et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00066-116956), United States of America v. Flores et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00066-116957), United States of America v. Flores-Guerrero (okwd-5:2022-cr-00055-116800), United States of America v. Fonseca (okwd-5:2022-cr-00132-117539), United States of America v. Ford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00009-116376), United States of America v. Ford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00443-119781), United States of America v. Ford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00187), United States of America v. Foster (okwd-5:2022-cr-00387-119311), United States of America v. Fowler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00366-119299), United States of America v. Fowler (okwd-5:2022-mj-00422), United States of America v. Fowler (okwd-5:2022-mj-00479), United States of America v. Fox (okwd-5:2022-mj-00197), United States of America v. Fraire-Aldaba (okwd-5:2022-mj-00089), United States of America v. Fraire-Aldaba (okwd-5:2022-cr-00085-117072), United States of America v. Francois (okwd-5:2022-mj-00421), United States of America v. Franklin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00370-119302), United States of America v. Frederick (okwd-5:2022-cr-00110-117391), United States of America v. Gallardo-Carbajal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00290-118674), United States of America v. Garcia (okwd-5:2022-mj-00429), United States of America v. Garcia-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00332-118992), United States of America v. Garrett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00489-120109), United States of America v. Garza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00215-118140), United States of America v. Gaskin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00286-118670), United States of America v. Gaxiola-Reynaga (okwd-5:2022-cr-00056-116794), United States of America v. Gaxiola-Reynaga (okwd-5:2022-cr-00056-116795), United States of America v. Geimausaddle (okwd-5:2022-cr-00439-119839), United States of America v. Gildon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00115-117401), United States of America v. Gill (okwd-5:2022-cr-00460-119844), United States of America v. Gillispie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00415-119603), United States of America v. Glaze (okwd-5:2022-cr-00425-119691), United States of America v. Glick (okwd-5:2022-mj-00188), United States of America v. Goins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00100-117304), United States of America v. Golden (okwd-5:2022-mj-00124), United States of America v. Goldsmith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00065-116948), United States of America v. Goleman (okwd-5:2022-mj-00423), United States of America v. Gomez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00424), United States of America v. Gomez-Nava (okwd-5:2022-cr-00070-116974), United States of America v. Gomez-Nava (okwd-5:2022-mj-00108), United States of America v. Gonzales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00350), United States of America v. Gonzales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00352), United States of America v. Gonzales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00282), United States of America v. Gonzalez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00080-116927), United States of America v. Gonzalez-Franco (okwd-5:2022-cr-00363-119277), United States of America v. Gonzalez-Zaragoza (okwd-5:2022-mj-00379), United States of America v. Gonzalez-Zaragoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00226-118209), United States of America v. Gottfried (okwd-5:2022-cr-00423-119689), United States of America v. Granados (okwd-5:2022-cr-00081-117034), United States of America v. Grant (okwd-5:2022-cr-00145-117545), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-cr-00384-119337), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-mj-00016), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-mj-00063), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-mj-00208), United States of America v. Green et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00033-116634), United States of America v. Green et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00033-116636), United States of America v. Gress (okwd-5:2022-cr-00479-119973), United States of America v. Griffith (okwd-5:2022-mj-00209), United States of America v. Griffitts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00250-118371), United States of America v. Guardiola-Gamez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00162-117642), United States of America v. Guedea (okwd-5:2022-cr-00237-118277), United States of America v. Guffey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00185), United States of America v. Gutierrez-Angeles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00051-116818), United States of America v. Haitshan (okwd-5:2022-mj-00023), United States of America v. Hall (okwd-5:2022-cr-00444-119785), United States of America v. Hamilton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00314-118815), United States of America v. Hardimon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00327-118984), United States of America v. Harmon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00192-117931), United States of America v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00381-119325), United States of America v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00021-116493), United States of America v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00021-116494), United States of America v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00328-118990), United States of America v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00114-117403), United States of America v. Harvey (okwd-5:2022-cr-00356-119076), United States of America v. Hebb (okwd-5:2022-mj-00461), United States of America v. Hedge et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00267-118511), United States of America v. Henderson et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00044), United States of America v. Hennings (okwd-5:2022-cr-00113-117429), United States of America v. Hennings (okwd-5:2022-mj-00133), United States of America v. Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00251-118352), United States of America v. Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00178), United States of America v. Hernandez et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00349), United States of America v. Hernandez-Alvarado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00147-117572), United States of America v. Hernandez-Campos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00020-116476), United States of America v. Hernandez-Contreras (okwd-5:2022-mj-00076), United States of America v. Herrera-Medina (okwd-5:2022-mj-00180), United States of America v. Hill (okwd-5:2022-cr-00189-117815), United States of America v. Hill (okwd-5:2022-mj-00116), United States of America v. Hilliard (okwd-5:2022-cr-00499-120238), United States of America v. Hinojosa-Velasquez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00486-120091), United States of America v. Hocker (okwd-5:2022-cr-00424-119659), United States of America v. Holder (okwd-5:2022-cr-00141-117562), United States of America v. Holder (okwd-5:2022-mj-00268), United States of America v. Hollis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00077), United States of America v. Hooee (okwd-5:2022-mj-00169), United States of America v. Hooper (okwd-5:2022-cr-00165-117649), United States of America v. Hopper (okwd-5:2022-mj-00266), United States of America v. Horn (okwd-5:2022-mj-00425), United States of America v. House (okwd-5:2022-cr-00174-117722), United States of America v. Howard (okwd-5:2022-cr-00010-116390), United States of America v. Howland (okwd-5:2022-cr-00438-119777), United States of America v. Hubbard (okwd-5:2022-cr-00106-117419), United States of America v. Hull (okwd-5:2022-cr-00050-116792), United States of America v. Hull (okwd-5:2022-mj-00302), United States of America v. Hunt (okwd-5:2022-mj-00174), United States of America v. Hunt (okwd-5:2022-cr-00107-117385), United States of America v. Hurd (okwd-5:2022-cr-00109-117424), United States of America v. Hurst (okwd-5:2022-cr-00083-117080), United States of America v. Hurst (okwd-5:2022-mj-00201), United States of America v. Hurst (okwd-5:2022-cr-00083-117081), United States of America v. Idell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00447-119796), United States of America v. Isbill (okwd-5:2022-mj-00274), United States of America v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00419-119678), United States of America v. Jamison (okwd-5:2022-mj-00463), United States of America v. Jaramillo-Orozco (okwd-5:2022-cr-00285-118662), United States of America v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00028-116565), United States of America v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00369-119317), United States of America v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00315), United States of America v. Jolliffe (okwd-5:2022-mj-00351), United States of America v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00129-117462), United States of America v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-mj-00450), United States of America v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-mj-00304), United States of America v. Kassanavoid (okwd-5:2022-cr-00185-117764), United States of America v. Kelley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00395-119450), United States of America v. Kennedy (okwd-5:2022-cr-00088-117109), United States of America v. Khan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00281-118576), United States of America v. Kidd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00006), United States of America v. Killough (okwd-5:2022-cr-00186-117786), United States of America v. King (okwd-5:2022-cr-00488-120115), United States of America v. King (okwd-5:2022-mj-00184), United States of America v. Lack (okwd-5:2022-cr-00336-118996), United States of America v. Lara (okwd-5:2022-cr-00464-119933), United States of America v. Laster (okwd-5:2022-cr-00046-116644), United States of America v. Law (okwd-5:2022-cr-00236-118216), United States of America v. Law (okwd-5:2022-cr-00236-118217), United States of America v. Leatherwood (okwd-5:2022-mj-00449), United States of America v. Lebron (okwd-5:2022-mj-00078), United States of America v. Lewis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00007), United States of America v. Lewis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00314), United States of America v. Lewis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00368-119284), United States of America v. Liles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00216-118211), United States of America v. Little (okwd-5:2022-mj-00444), United States of America v. Littlejohn (okwd-5:2022-mj-00161), United States of America v. Littlejohn (okwd-5:2022-cr-00102-117393), United States of America v. Loera-Macias (okwd-5:2022-cr-00480-119968), United States of America v. Long (okwd-5:2022-cr-00440-119748), United States of America v. Longman (okwd-5:2022-cr-00151-117564), United States of America v. Longman (okwd-5:2022-mj-00247), United States of America v. Lopez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00420-119686), United States of America v. Lopez-Nava et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00221-118213), United States of America v. Lopez-Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00304-118795), United States of America v. Lopez-Segura (okwd-5:2022-cr-00196-117942), United States of America v. Lopez-Segura (okwd-5:2022-mj-00325), United States of America v. Lopez-Zavala et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00004-116343), United States of America v. Lopez-Zavala et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00004-116344), United States of America v. Lopez-Zavala et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00004-116345), United States of America v. Lozania-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00183), United States of America v. Lucas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00480), United States of America v. Lucas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00477), United States of America v. Luper (okwd-5:2022-cr-00096-117253), United States of America v. Lusio-Flores (okwd-5:2022-cr-00418-119638), United States of America v. Machado (okwd-5:2022-mj-00254), United States of America v. Machado-Soto (okwd-5:2022-cr-00484-120107), United States of America v. Macias-Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00053-116808), United States of America v. Madala (okwd-5:2022-cr-00150-117582), United States of America v. Madden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00026-116412), United States of America v. Maese-Luna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00399-119473), United States of America v. Maese-Munoz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00054-116802), United States of America v. Maese-Munoz (okwd-5:2022-mj-00073), United States of America v. Mahan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00191-117933), United States of America v. Maher (okwd-5:2022-mj-00354), United States of America v. Maley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00435-119622), United States of America v. Maley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00435-119621), United States of America v. Mansel (okwd-5:2022-mj-00340), United States of America v. Marris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00197-117937), United States of America v. Marris (okwd-5:2022-mj-00323), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00361), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00230), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00223-118171), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00302-118709), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00137-117591), United States of America v. Martinez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00199-117954), United States of America v. Martinez-Rincon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00052-116816), United States of America v. Martinie-Ontiveros (okwd-5:2022-cr-00245-118375), United States of America v. Mays (okwd-5:2022-mj-00008), United States of America v. Mays (okwd-5:2022-mj-00170), United States of America v. Mazariegos-Mencia (okwd-5:2022-mj-00495), United States of America v. McAlister (okwd-5:2022-mj-00462), United States of America v. McClain (okwd-5:2022-cr-00027-116414), United States of America v. McClinton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00032-116621), United States of America v. McClinton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00032-116622), United States of America v. McClinton (okwd-5:2022-mj-00019), United States of America v. McCullough (okwd-5:2022-cr-00293-118698), United States of America v. McDonald (okwd-5:2022-mj-00129), United States of America v. McDonald (okwd-5:2022-mj-00125), United States of America v. McGuire (okwd-5:2022-cr-00482-120103), United States of America v. McKay et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00015-116473), United States of America v. Mead (okwd-5:2022-mj-00305), United States of America v. Meadows (okwd-5:2022-mj-00004), United States of America v. Medina-Gamez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00224-118173), United States of America v. Medina-Gil (okwd-5:2022-cr-00487-120101), United States of America v. Mendez-Porto (okwd-5:2022-cr-00396-119490), United States of America v. Merit (okwd-5:2022-mj-00009), United States of America v. Mihelic (okwd-5:2022-mj-00026), United States of America v. Miles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00105-117380), United States of America v. Miller (okwd-5:2022-mj-00355), United States of America v. Miller (okwd-5:2022-cr-00073-116954), United States of America v. Miller (okwd-5:2022-cr-00003-116328), United States of America v. Miller et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00218-118184), United States of America v. Mireles-Moreno (okwd-5:2022-cr-00400-119483), United States of America v. Mitchell (okwd-5:2022-mj-00202), United States of America v. Mitchell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00322-118973), United States of America v. Modesto-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00238), United States of America v. Modesto-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00335-119031), United States of America v. Molina-Molina (okwd-5:2022-mj-00172), United States of America v. Molina-Molina (okwd-5:2022-cr-00090-117119), United States of America v. Montijo-Varela et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00465-119951), United States of America v. Monts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00329-118979), United States of America v. Moore (okwd-5:2022-cr-00171-117724), United States of America v. Moore (okwd-5:2022-mj-00037), United States of America v. Morales-Elizalde (okwd-5:2022-mj-00103), United States of America v. Morales-Elizalde (okwd-5:2022-cr-00069-116976), United States of America v. Morales-Elizalde (okwd-5:2022-cr-00069-116977), United States of America v. Morales-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00242-118358), United States of America v. Morales-Mata (okwd-5:2022-cr-00279-118493), United States of America v. Morales-Mata (okwd-5:2022-mj-00382), United States of America v. Moreno et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00404-119468), United States of America v. Morris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00175-117712), United States of America v. Morris (okwd-5:2022-mj-00027), United States of America v. Moseley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00116-117413), United States of America v. Najera-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00347), United States of America v. Najera-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00195-117944), United States of America v. Nava-Guerra (okwd-5:2022-mj-00374), United States of America v. Nelson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00010), United States of America v. Nelson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00324-118977), United States of America v. Nguyen (okwd-5:2022-mj-00460), United States of America v. Nichols (okwd-5:2022-cr-00103-117431), United States of America v. Northcutt (okwd-5:2022-cr-00098-117213), United States of America v. Ochoa-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00472-119927), United States of America v. Ochoa-Santos et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00049-116798), United States of America v. Ochoa-Santos et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00049-116796), United States of America v. Olmedo-Acevedo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00497-120181), United States of America v. Ontiveros-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00101-117405), United States of America v. Ontiveros-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00163), United States of America v. Orellana (okwd-5:2022-cr-00019-116508), United States of America v. Orellana (okwd-5:2022-cr-00019-116509), United States of America v. Ortiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00321-119058), United States of America v. Ortiz-Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00397-119479), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00217-118193), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-mj-00496), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00405-119464), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00308-118813), United States of America v. Outland (okwd-5:2022-cr-00385-119323), United States of America v. Owens (okwd-5:2022-cr-00273-118501), United States of America v. Padilla-Chairez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00289-118684), United States of America v. Palma-Castellanos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00483-120089), United States of America v. Patino-Delgado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00089-117111), United States of America v. Paulick (okwd-5:2022-cr-00144-117568), United States of America v. Pennington (okwd-5:2022-cr-00022-116478), United States of America v. Perdomo (okwd-5:2022-mj-00090), United States of America v. Perez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00064-117069), United States of America v. Perez-Barrera (okwd-5:2022-cr-00359-119165), United States of America v. Perez-Lopez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00270-118525), United States of America v. Perez-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00498-120055), United States of America v. Perez-Torres (okwd-5:2022-cr-00173-117738), United States of America v. Perez-Torres (okwd-5:2022-mj-00285), United States of America v. Peterson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00139), United States of America v. Peuplie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00437-119702), United States of America v. Pihl (okwd-5:2022-mj-00203), United States of America v. Ping Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00225), United States of America v. Pitts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00104-117359), United States of America v. Plummer et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00247-118366), United States of America v. Polite (okwd-5:2022-cr-00249-118373), United States of America v. Polly (okwd-5:2022-cr-00383-119309), United States of America v. Ponce Vargas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00136-117566), United States of America v. Ponce Vargas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00240), United States of America v. Porter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00166-117647), United States of America v. Porter et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00034), United States of America v. Powell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00382-119339), United States of America v. Puentas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00467), United States of America v. Puentes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00337-119000), United States of America v. Purkey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00057), United States of America v. Quijivix et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00384), United States of America v. Ramirez-Castaneda (okwd-5:2022-cr-00244-118384), United States of America v. Rangel-Melendez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00397), United States of America v. Rangel-Melendez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00238-118302), United States of America v. Rasberry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00214-117880), United States of America v. Ray (okwd-5:2022-cr-00072-116986), United States of America v. Rayford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00381), United States of America v. Red Elk (okwd-5:2022-mj-00306), United States of America v. Redd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00430), United States of America v. Redd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00267), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00031-116617), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00031-116616), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00017), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00031-116618), United States of America v. Rendon-Fraire (okwd-5:2022-cr-00470-119954), United States of America v. Resendiz-Olguin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00475), United States of America v. Reves (okwd-5:2022-mj-00321), United States of America v. Reyes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00127-117342), United States of America v. Ritchie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00392-119441), United States of America v. Rivera (okwd-5:2022-mj-00419), United States of America v. Robinson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00043-116695), United States of America v. Robledo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00041-116603), United States of America v. Robledo-Chavez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00353-118957), United States of America v. Robledo-Chavez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00243-118360), United States of America v. Robledo-Chavez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00437), United States of America v. Rocha De Lucena (okwd-5:2022-mj-00168), United States of America v. Rodas-Mendez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00269-118507), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00457), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00320-118775), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00426), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00422-119661), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00320-118774), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00262-118396), United States of America v. Rodriguez Ortega et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00085), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Bernal (okwd-5:2022-mj-00415), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Bernal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00282-118581), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Bernal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00282-118582), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Cruz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00469-119931), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Herrera (okwd-5:2022-cr-00288-118676), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Herrera (okwd-5:2022-cr-00099-117312), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Morales (okwd-5:2022-cr-00313-118797), United States of America v. Rogers (okwd-5:2022-mj-00358), United States of America v. Rogers (okwd-5:2022-mj-00173), United States of America v. Rogers (okwd-5:2022-cr-00135-117584), United States of America v. Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00014), United States of America v. Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00312), United States of America v. Rojo Alvarado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00307-118807), United States of America v. Romero-Mendoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00468-119929), United States of America v. Ross (okwd-5:2022-mj-00079), United States of America v. Ruelas-Pena (okwd-5:2022-cr-00118-117397), United States of America v. Ruelas-Pena (okwd-5:2022-mj-00162), United States of America v. Ruiz et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00291-118695), United States of America v. Sandefur (okwd-5:2022-mj-00126), United States of America v. Sapcut (okwd-5:2022-mj-00105), United States of America v. Sapcut (okwd-5:2022-cr-00091-117123), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00190), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00404), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00405), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00080), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00177), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00192), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00364), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00385), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00143), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00489), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00112), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00249), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00199), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00339), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00370), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00198), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00371), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00375), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00191), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00335), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00394), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00403), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00043), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00104), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00226), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00338), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00109), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00248), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00332), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00373), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00439), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00070), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00101), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00114), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00406), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00497), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00311), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00487), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00111), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00140), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00333), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00491), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00369), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00102), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00115), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00144), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00147), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00336), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00042), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00492), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00122), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00337), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00176), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00222), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00410), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00040), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00250), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00440), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00389), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00451), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00365), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00368), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00372), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00402), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00409), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00098), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00407), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00041), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00075), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00408), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00486), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00039), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00050), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00074), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00069), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00113), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00488), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00490), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00158), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00265), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00141), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00148), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00367), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00100), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00366), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00088), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00099), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00193), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00334), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00046), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00346), United States of America v. Segundo-Pacheco (okwd-5:2022-cr-00402-119486), United States of America v. Shannon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00128-117433), United States of America v. Shaputis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00474-119935), United States of America v. Shaw (okwd-5:2022-cr-00013-116498), United States of America v. Shaw (okwd-5:2022-cr-00013-116497), United States of America v. Shepherd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00307), United States of America v. Shockey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00142), United States of America v. Simmons (okwd-5:2022-mj-00127), United States of America v. Simpson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00139-117593), United States of America v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-mj-00442), United States of America v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00283-118737), United States of America v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00272-118505), United States of America v. Solis-Mancilla (okwd-5:2022-mj-00428), United States of America v. South (okwd-5:2022-cr-00131-117597), United States of America v. Speal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00130-117492), United States of America v. Spikes (okwd-5:2022-mj-00356), United States of America v. Stark (okwd-5:2022-cr-00220-118178), United States of America v. Stephens (okwd-5:2022-cr-00310-118811), United States of America v. Stilley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00357-119092), United States of America v. Stinnett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00458-119772), United States of America v. Strange (okwd-5:2022-mj-00132), United States of America v. Stutson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00331-118986), United States of America v. Surber (okwd-5:2022-cr-00042-116610), United States of America v. Sutherland (okwd-5:2022-mj-00316), United States of America v. Tagle (okwd-5:2022-mj-00060), United States of America v. Tenpenny (okwd-5:2022-cr-00029-116555), United States of America v. Tevelan-Ajanel (okwd-5:2022-mj-00273), United States of America v. Thomas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00016-116502), United States of America v. Thomas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00016-116503), United States of America v. Thompson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00062), United States of America v. Tiger (okwd-5:2022-cr-00481-120057), United States of America v. Tolliver (okwd-5:2022-cr-00315-118823), United States of America v. Torres-Cervantes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00018-116491), United States of America v. Trizon-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00134-117541), United States of America v. Trizon-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00210), United States of America v. Tucker (okwd-5:2022-cr-00354-119171), United States of America v. Urias (okwd-5:2022-mj-00318), United States of America v. Urias et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00241), United States of America v. Utley (okwd-5:2022-mj-00494), United States of America v. Valdez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00097), United States of America v. Valdez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00067-116980), United States of America v. Valdez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00067-116981), United States of America v. Valdez Silva (okwd-5:2022-mj-00028), United States of America v. Valentin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00436-119633), United States of America v. Valle (okwd-5:2022-cr-00352-118954), United States of America v. Vargas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00246-118354), United States of America v. Vargas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00149-117551), United States of America v. Vargas et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00401), United States of America v. Vasquez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00036-116632), United States of America v. Venegas-Reyes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00012-116495), United States of America v. Walker (okwd-5:2022-mj-00061), United States of America v. Walters (okwd-5:2022-cr-00394-119462), United States of America v. Walters (okwd-5:2022-mj-00464), United States of America v. Walters (okwd-5:2022-mj-00204), United States of America v. Warden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00228-118169), United States of America v. Warren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00421-119640), United States of America v. Washington (okwd-5:2022-cr-00446-119787), United States of America v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00428-119669), United States of America v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00466-119960), United States of America v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00325-118981), United States of America v. Watson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00281), United States of America v. Webb (okwd-5:2022-cr-00323-118975), United States of America v. Wemyss (okwd-5:2022-mj-00065), United States of America v. West (okwd-5:2022-cr-00403-119488), United States of America v. Wetzel (okwd-5:2022-mj-00357), United States of America v. Wheeler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00014-116500), United States of America v. Wheeler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00014-116499), United States of America v. Widner (okwd-5:2022-mj-00234), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00008-116366), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00170-117730), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00045-116683), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00448-119821), United States of America v. Willis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00108-117387), United States of America v. Wolf (okwd-5:2022-mj-00308), United States of America v. Wolfe (okwd-5:2022-mj-00128), United States of America v. Wood (okwd-5:2022-cr-00463-119944), United States of America v. Worden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00367-119279), United States of America v. Worden (okwd-5:2022-mj-00068), United States of America v. Young (okwd-5:2022-cr-00492-120099), United States of America v. Zuniga-Magdaleno (okwd-5:2022-cr-00048-116674), United States of America v. Zuniga-Magdaleno (okwd-5:2022-mj-00045).